Why is the military publicizing its upcoming operations in Afghanistan?

[pauldun170]

Why is the military publicizing its upcoming operations in Afghanistan?
WASHINGTON (CNN) - When it comes to launching a major military
operation, most would assume that preparations are done secretly so as not to
tip off the enemy.

So how do the U.S., coalition military and Afghan government prepare for
a major clearing operation to eliminate the Taliban from an insurgent
stronghold? Talk about it publicly ahead of time.

For months now, one of the worst kept secrets in Afghanistan's central
Helmand region has been the forthcoming operation to take back control of the
poppy-covered and Taliban-held Marjah district in the restive central Helmand
province region.

The area is home to some of the most serious fighting between the
coalition and Taliban in the country, and also is some of the most fertile land
in the country.

Helmand province is in southern central Afghanistan and is patrolled
mainly by forces from the United Kingdom and U.S. Marines, and it has been on
the coalition's radar for a long time as Taliban dug in and funded their
operations with money from poppy production.

Central Helmand is also home to the majority of the world supply of
heroin, about 60 percent, according to U.S. government officials.
The relationship of convenience between narco-traffickers and the Taliban
brings in about $400 million to the Taliban from the poppy sales, "more than
enough for them to conduct the kind of operations they do," according to a
senior U.S. military official.

The U.S. military has been briefing reporters for months on basics,
mainly that the Marjah region is the target of this operation. However,
officials have been leaving out details of how and when the operation will go
down.

The British military even put out a press release with the name of the
effort, Operation Moshtarak, which means "together" in Afghanistan's
Persian-language dialect of Dari, saying the military is in the "shape" phase
of the operation.

There have also been discussions with local governmental leaders about
the operation, and those leaders have in turn spread the word around the local
population.

So why, if the enemy is concentrated in one area, would the top commander
in Afghanistan authorize the publicity of a major operation to go in, clear the
area of Taliban and try to convince poppy growers to switch to wheat?
It is a curious plan, but a plan that both Defense Secretary Robert Gates
and Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen agree with and signed off on.

The answer, it seems, is based on human nature. If you are told the
military is going to conduct a major operation in your region and you are one
of the bad guys, common sense says you pack up and leave.
But in this case, part of the message has been sent to the local
population to let them know the Afghan government will support them if they
change from growing poppy to growing wheat of other non-narco crops.
That paves the way, the military hopes, for less combat and leaves Afghan
and coalition forces with a local population, in theory, willing to work with
them.

There are problems with this kind of plan, though. The Taliban have
plenty of time to plant roadside bombs and leave other deadly surprises behind
for the Afghan and coalition troops.

The military understands this and expects this, and is prepared for
casualties - but the benefits outweigh the negatives, according to military
officials.

If the local population understands ahead of time that the government and
local security forces will deliver jobs and security, then the fight will not
be that bad.

The Marjah model is something McChrystal is counting on working; if it
does, it will be applied to numerous other problem areas around the country,
according to U.S. military officials.

Proof that this could work is counter-intuitively based on the failure of
U.K. troops in the same area last year. There was no support form the local
government or Afghan forces and the local governances did not end up supporting
the local populations and remained influenced by the Taliban.

U.S. commanders are hopeful, and believe this formula of broadcasting the
plans that will be more effective.

The question remains - if this does not work, where does that leave the
U.S. and the Afghan government in the eyes of the local population who already
are weary of their intentions?

[Rider]

Don't you tell your wife you are out at a sports bar with your friends when you are actually at a strip club? Same thing.

[fatbuckRTO]

Same reason we can't do night raids anymore.

[Adeptus_Minor]

Originally Posted by fatbuckRTO

Same reason we can't do night raids anymore.

Why not?
The news crews provide excellent lighting.

[fatbuckRTO]

Originally Posted by Adeptus_Minor

Why not?

Because none of the leadership here wants to win.

[Captain Morgan]

Only problem I see here is that the farmers will make more from poppy than they will from wheat, so what is their incentive to switch?

[z06boy]

Embedded news crews with live broadcast = some of the dumbest chit I've ever seen UNLESS it's like Rider said and just a bait and switch.

I remember seeing Marines lying in the sand in total darkness except for the lights from the camera crew and the news correspondant talking about the "secret mission/attack"...Whiskey Tango Foxtrot !!

Originally Posted by Captain Morgan

Only problem I see here is that the farmers will make more from poppy than they will from wheat, so what is their incentive to switch?

This too

[EpyonXero]

Originally Posted by Captain Morgan

Only problem I see here is that the farmers will make more from poppy than they will from wheat, so what is their incentive to switch?

Bullets, obviously.