11-17-2008, 09:51 PM | #51 | |
WSB Champion
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Anaheim, CA
Moto: 2009 Kawi ZX6R
Posts: 5,570
|
Quote:
Doubting though if your getting 20mpg you would see any difference.
__________________
Train Hard Ron Paul - 2012 Mark of Excellence GM |
|
11-18-2008, 12:12 AM | #52 | |
TWFix Legend
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Denver CO
Moto: 01 BMW F650GS Dakar
Posts: 15,677
|
Quote:
it's an 07... 4.7 not the big 5.8L they came out with in 08. but he's gotten 25 on more than a couple tanks keeping it under 65 (he lives a ways out so most of his driving is highway with little to no traffic). |
|
11-18-2008, 12:35 AM | #53 | |
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,556
|
Quote:
BTW on topic,you should regularly check your tire pressure and stay on top of your car's maintenance. |
|
11-18-2008, 12:48 AM | #54 | |
TWFix Legend
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Denver CO
Moto: 01 BMW F650GS Dakar
Posts: 15,677
|
Quote:
|
|
11-18-2008, 01:20 AM | #55 |
Trip's Assistant
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Imported from Detroit
Moto: 2009 HD Street Classic
Posts: 12,149
|
Yeah I doubt the mpg increase from prem vs reg. Go talk to a engine builder... if the motor isn't built for the higher octane you're wasting your money.
Now granted I have had a car before that ran better on mid grade cause it was getting pre-ignition knock. So things happen. But Ford's also made the Mustang GT to run on 87... but if you want to throw more timing at it... you'll need more octane. |
11-18-2008, 02:54 AM | #56 | |
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,556
|
Quote:
1. it costs more/requires more effort to refine 2. it has higher taxes attached to it 3. the necessary additives increase the cost 4. the oil to fuel ratio is lower So what is the primary reason? |
|
11-18-2008, 02:57 AM | #57 |
TWFix Legend
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Denver CO
Moto: 01 BMW F650GS Dakar
Posts: 15,677
|
up until Gas went over $2... diesel was always cheaper than even regular...
|
11-18-2008, 03:14 AM | #58 | |
WSB Champion
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Anaheim, CA
Moto: 2009 Kawi ZX6R
Posts: 5,570
|
Quote:
The main reason for higher octance is to resist knock, but that wasn't the discussion. Less refineries. Period.
__________________
Train Hard Ron Paul - 2012 Mark of Excellence GM |
|
11-18-2008, 09:57 AM | #59 | |
WERA White Plate
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,059
|
Quote:
I did some reading yesterday, and the point you're making about chain length does make some sense, Carbon-Carbon bonds have more energy than Carbon-Hydrogen bonds, But there was some hedging that most of the differences were due to density, not octane. And everyone I've ever heard on the topic has said that higher octane doesn't improve mileage. I'd be surprised that you can measure a difference based on octane alone if your engine doesn't need higher octane or you don't adjust it for higher octane. Your bike just might need a bit more octane, hence the reason you get a 4-5% bump in mileage. And with more advanced engine management higher octane might very well give better mileage, but only be cause engine management retards the timing a bit with lower octane(in other words read your manual and use the fuel grade they tell you to). |
|
11-18-2008, 09:58 AM | #60 |
WERA White Plate
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,059
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|