05-14-2009, 10:37 AM | #111 | |
Letzroll
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lake Norman area, NC
Moto: 07 Red R1 & 07 Blue R6
Posts: 5,265
|
Quote:
The hp/tq #'s is what I had the biggest problem with. It's easy to say two bikes have the same hp but if the tq isn't the same as well...it's still apples and oranges and NOT FAIR and that is my biggest gripe about an 1125 cc Buell competing with a 600 cc give or take inline four. The Buell may have equal hp but it sure has more torque and can get rolling quicker. Trying to figure out "how much weight to add" is pretty tough to make things even. |
|
05-14-2009, 10:42 AM | #112 | |
WERA White Plate
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,059
|
Quote:
|
|
05-14-2009, 10:46 AM | #113 |
Letzroll
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lake Norman area, NC
Moto: 07 Red R1 & 07 Blue R6
Posts: 5,265
|
I guess next year may be better...it just sux to adjust as you go. I say put an anvil on the bigger bikes and do small adjustments back down instead of letting them win like they are doing and then adding small amounts.
|
05-14-2009, 12:30 PM | #114 | |
WERA White Plate
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,059
|
Quote:
Hp is the amount of work done in a given time. 100 hp of work is 100 hp of work. If it's not fair that a 100/100 engine race with a 100/55 engine, is it fair that an engine that is designed to rev to 16,000 rpm is raced against one designed to rev to 10,000? Everyone knows that HP goes up with rpm as long as you can keep the torque from falling to fast. Besides, I'd bet the Buells dyno'd with more hp than they did at the beginning of the season, and it showed up in the results, and they got weight added for it. |
|
05-14-2009, 01:29 PM | #115 | |
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,556
|
Quote:
|
|
05-14-2009, 01:48 PM | #116 | |
Letzroll
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lake Norman area, NC
Moto: 07 Red R1 & 07 Blue R6
Posts: 5,265
|
Quote:
Ok back to my original stand...it's BS for an 1125 Buell to race against 600's and then for owners to brag IF they actually win...wanna be a big boy...then go race with the litre bikes like Ducati. 100 hp is 100 hp no matter where you acheive it but if you have more torque even though the hp is the same...it's an unfair advantage...again...just go run with like size bikes. Some of you must have been on your debate team in school and just enjoy it. Argue with someone and then when they might possibly agree with something you say....change positions and argue some more. Last edited by z06boy; 05-14-2009 at 03:31 PM.. |
|
05-14-2009, 01:58 PM | #117 | |
Raving Lunatic
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Moto: Concours 14 ABS, ZX6E
Posts: 902
|
Quote:
That's not what this is. This is a class where, from what I can see, the Japanese manufacturers have to play by the rules and Buell doesn't.
__________________
Slow is smooth, smooth is fast. |
|
05-14-2009, 03:37 PM | #118 |
Aspiring Rapper
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Halifax, NS
Moto: '12 CB1000R
Posts: 3,569
|
Did you guys also think it was bs when Hayden won the AMA championship?
|
05-14-2009, 03:45 PM | #119 | |
WERA White Plate
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,059
|
Quote:
No, but maybe I should have. So, lets say to make the math easier we have 2 engines one makes 100hp/100tq at 6,000 rpm. The other is 100hp/50tq at 12,000 rpm. Lets also say the tq peak is at 66% the hp peak rpm so 4,000 rpm for the big engine, and 8,000 for the little engine, their power output will be the same. The big engine doesn't have any advantage. It all boils down to this: For a given displacement, and the same state of tune, more cylinders will give you more peak hp at the cost of tq, at a higher rpm. |
|
05-14-2009, 03:49 PM | #120 | |
WERA White Plate
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,059
|
Quote:
And if I'm not mistaken, Buell is Austrian. Where is Buell not playing by the rules? |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|