Lame - calling out Billionares for not pledging their cash - Page 2

Avatard · 08-19-2010, 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 101lifts2

You sound like a Dumbocrat.

And you think that sounds intelligent?

What are you, five?

TYEster · 08-19-2010, 12:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 101lifts2

You sound like a Dumbocrat.

Vs a Retardican?

pauldun170 · 08-19-2010, 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TYEster

Vs a Retardican?

Thats kind of like the backyardagins isn't it?

101lifts2 · 08-19-2010, 02:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avatard

And you think that sounds intelligent?

What are you, five?

Almost as dumb as saying...well they can afford it. It's fucking retarded.

Democrats are all for taxing people more until the tax burden comes upon them. Fucking hypocrites.

Papa_Complex · 08-19-2010, 08:28 AM

Another announcement that's missing from The Press; notice that Mark Riddix is willing to give away half his shit.

Smittie61984 · 08-19-2010, 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneSickPsycho

They should just be taxed a real 50%.

They'd probably be happy with that.

Apoc · 08-22-2010, 12:46 AM

Fuck that, I wouldnt give half my money to charity if I was a billionaire either... And I wouldnt be shy to say why. Because its my fucking money, thats why.

Avatard · 08-22-2010, 12:58 AM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcCXnXDiKoQ

Homeslice · 08-23-2010, 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tmall

Then you wouldn't mind being taxed at that rate either?

Nobody would, but who would be harmed more by such a tax rate, the rich or the poor?

This country has had a progressive tax rate for, what, 100 years at least? So the fact that the rich have more of the burden is nothing new.

You guys act like a flat tax or a consumption tax would help rein in government spending. LOL, they'd just set it at a level that actually INCREASES the amount they rake in.

And you'd be the ones to blame, because you voted for them and didn't do shit to stop them.

pauldun170 · 08-23-2010, 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Homeslice

Nobody would, but who would be harmed more by such a tax rate, the rich or the poor?

This country has had a progressively increasing tax rate for, what, 100 years at least? So the fact that the rich have more of the burden is nothing new.

You guys act like a flat tax or a consumption tax would help rein in government spending. LOL, they'd just set it at a level that actually INCREASES the amount they rake in.

And you'd be the ones to blame, because you voted for them and didn't do shit to stop them.

http://www.ntu.org/tax-basics/histor...ividual-1.html

08-19-2010, 08:28 AM	#15
Papa_Complex Nomadic Tribesman Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Brampton, Canada Moto: '09 ER-6n Posts: 11,150	Another announcement that's missing from The Press; notice that Mark Riddix is willing to give away half his shit. __________________ "Everything's better with pirates." - Lodge, "Dorkness Rising" http://www.morallyambiguous.net/

08-22-2010, 12:46 AM	#17
Apoc For Science. You Monster. Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Canada Moto: '08 HD FLSTSB Posts: 3,546	Fuck that, I wouldnt give half my money to charity if I was a billionaire either... And I wouldnt be shy to say why. Because its my fucking money, thats why. __________________ Android OS causes gay. Dont let your child use Android (unless she's a hot female). And dont let your babies grow up to be cowboys, either.

08-22-2010, 12:58 AM	#18
Avatard Crotch Rocket Curmudgeon Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Here to integrity Moto: Li'l red baby Ninja Posts: 7,482	http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcCXnXDiKoQ __________________ Insert free thought here.