12-18-2008, 09:42 AM | #71 | |
WERA White Plate
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Renton, WA
Moto: Ninja 650R
Posts: 1,920
|
TWO ZTL rotors?!
__________________
Quote:
|
|
12-18-2008, 02:14 PM | #72 | |
DefenderOfTheBuelliverse
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Parts Unknown
Moto: Buell XB12R
Posts: 18,585
|
__________________
Quote:
|
|
12-18-2008, 05:03 PM | #73 |
Ride Naked.
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Flat and Straight ND
Moto: 08 BUELL 1125R, 05 SV650S
Posts: 7,916
|
That would totaly defeat the purpose while giving unbelievable stopping power and braking area!
|
12-19-2008, 08:51 AM | #74 | |
DefenderOfTheBuelliverse
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Parts Unknown
Moto: Buell XB12R
Posts: 18,585
|
Yep.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
12-19-2008, 09:15 AM | #75 |
flyin high
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: cali
Moto: 10speed huffy w/cards in the spokes
Posts: 2,318
|
i know, but it would look sweet. and one finger braking...
or great brakes without the need to upgrade pads, like many of u mentioned... |
12-19-2008, 11:31 AM | #76 | |
Tractor Driver
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Franklin, TN
Moto: Buell XB12X Ulysses
Posts: 1,007
|
Quote:
Pad upgrades are no big deal. They are a consumable. The stock brake pads suck. You are only providing what comes on other bikes stock with an upgrade. Then what you get are brakes that function as well as two rotor designs plus the 8lbs per wheel of unsprung weight savings.
__________________
"I do get tired of reading,'my buddy is a racer and says the Buell will never work' I always want to say 'Who the F*CK is your buddy and is he faster than Shawn Higbee?" --Erik Buell |
|
12-19-2008, 09:53 PM | #77 | |
flyin high
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: cali
Moto: 10speed huffy w/cards in the spokes
Posts: 2,318
|
Quote:
dont think its 8lbs..maybe more like 4-5, that caliper looks waaaay bigger than the 1st version. when the 1st version first came out i think they claimed 6 or 7lbs dif it seems most of the weight is saved from the rim, so couldnt u possibly have two ztl rotors, and two smaller calipers and come out with slightly better brakes with out changing the weight much if any? |
|
12-20-2008, 08:14 PM | #78 | |
Ride Naked.
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Flat and Straight ND
Moto: 08 BUELL 1125R, 05 SV650S
Posts: 7,916
|
Quote:
The weight savings is from one less rotor, one less caliper, and all the fasteners involved for said items. |
|
12-20-2008, 09:32 PM | #79 | |
flyin high
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: cali
Moto: 10speed huffy w/cards in the spokes
Posts: 2,318
|
Quote:
the guys complaining arent racers as far as i know doesnt matter, id never get a 1125. dont hurt to analyze innovation tho |
|
12-21-2008, 09:57 AM | #80 | |
DefenderOfTheBuelliverse
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Parts Unknown
Moto: Buell XB12R
Posts: 18,585
|
Wheel is correct. Just look how thin the spokes are...the braking forces aren't being transfered to the hub with the ZTL.
The stock pads...and I dont know about the 1125...as I've had limited riding time on them...but on the Firebolt they are too soft. They leave deposits on the rotors that make it feel warped. The Lyndall Gold's took care of all of that. They have great feel and great power. Buell wheel:
__________________
Quote:
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|