|
02-18-2010, 12:53 AM | #1 |
uncomfortably numb
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: JOH-JAH!
Moto: WR250R & Bonneville
Posts: 409
|
2007-current Suzuki Bandit 1250S
...
Last edited by Triple; 04-07-2010 at 12:06 PM.. |
02-18-2010, 01:41 AM | #2 |
Viff6N Mutated Warrior
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Texas
Moto: '01 Honda VFR 800 & '09 ER-6N
Posts: 8,704
|
I've only heard love stories from people with the new bandits.
|
02-18-2010, 09:47 AM | #3 |
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,156
|
It's big and heavy, that's the only problem you need to know about to keep you from buying one.
|
02-18-2010, 10:25 AM | #4 |
White Trash Hero
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NW Arkansas
Moto: Buell 1125R Porco Rosso Edition
Posts: 4,895
|
The old ones were air/oil cooled 1100s. Pretty bullet proof with old style top side valve adjustement. I am not certain how many improvements they made with the new gen 1250 but I do know they plated the cylinder liners with SCEM? Suzuki Composite Electro Material or some shyte that was supposed to seat the rings better with less friction.
__________________
Arkriders.com To be the best you must first be willing to risk the worst! |
02-18-2010, 10:28 AM | #5 | |
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,156
|
Quote:
|
|
02-18-2010, 06:08 PM | #6 |
AMA Supersport
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,756
|
It has been pretty common in cars for quite a while. BMW had problems with the plating coming off and eating engines in the mid 90s and Jag had the same thing in the late 90s. I think it has been in 4 stroke bikes longer than that.
|
02-20-2010, 11:44 AM | #7 | |
Kneedragger
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Va
Moto: varies
Posts: 227
|
Quote:
The old ones were 1200s. With regard to the old ones eating oil, that was only a select few 2002 models. That was a issue that was way overhyped. It was a ring issue. Some where fixed, some were not. I would buy a 3rd Bandit 1200 in a new york minute. Very fun bikes. The new ones are very much different. Totally different bikes IMO. |
|
02-18-2010, 01:52 PM | #8 |
Custom User Title
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central NY
Moto: 2003 SV650S
Posts: 14,959
|
Yes: from what I've heard (and experienced once) you won't want to stop riding it.
__________________
I'm not "fat." I'm "Enlarged to show texture." Handle every stressful situation like a DOG: If you can't eat it or hump it, pi$$ on it & walk away. |
02-18-2010, 01:59 PM | #9 |
token jewboy
Join Date: Nov 2008
Moto: CBR 900, KLR ugly ass duckling, Gas Man
Posts: 10,799
|
Its big and heavy, a little tall for me with a 31" inseam, but once ou et moving you never feel the weight. Its definatley no SS, wont handle like the SV, has more power than the SV, but probably isn't much faster, its built with low mid range power more than the SV. And its way more comfortable.
__________________
|
02-18-2010, 02:05 PM | #10 | ||
WERA White Plate
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Renton, WA
Moto: Ninja 650R
Posts: 1,920
|
Quote:
I demoed an '08 I think. Super smooth engine but the trans is kinda clunky- typical zook. Top two gears feel like overdrive- around 2500 RPM at 65 in 6th. Seat doesn't slide you into the tank, but the bars are too high. Suspension and brakes are soft. The right mods (emulators, pads, bars) and it's a perfectly capable, comfortable bike.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|