12-14-2009, 01:36 PM | #11 |
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,156
|
|
12-14-2009, 01:41 PM | #12 | |
AMA Supersport
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,756
|
Quote:
|
|
12-14-2009, 01:44 PM | #13 |
SFL Expatriate #1
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: ATL Burbs
Moto: '09 Triumph Speed Triple
Posts: 4,712
|
|
12-14-2009, 01:58 PM | #14 | |
Get Fit...or Get OUT
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: KS
Moto: 07 M109-R
Posts: 1,993
|
Quote:
We've got the Carbon Fiber Facility line that manufactures the Section 41 of the 787 running again now...slowly...hoping to get up to full production rate early next year. Last edited by KSGregman; 12-14-2009 at 02:01 PM.. |
|
12-14-2009, 02:11 PM | #15 | |
AMA Supersport
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,756
|
Quote:
Out of curiosity do you all buy the carbon fiber or make it within the company, and is it a wet layup or do you use a pre-preg process? |
|
12-14-2009, 03:12 PM | #16 |
Custom User Title
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central NY
Moto: 2003 SV650S
Posts: 14,959
|
__________________
I'm not "fat." I'm "Enlarged to show texture." Handle every stressful situation like a DOG: If you can't eat it or hump it, pi$$ on it & walk away. |
12-14-2009, 03:34 PM | #17 |
Kneedragger
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 170
|
Some industry people had told me that during some time of the design process they were offering a $10k bonus to employees who could save a pound of weight off the aircraft. Not sure the truth behind that. But it doesn't sound too far fetched
|
12-14-2009, 04:04 PM | #18 |
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,156
|
Yes this is true. Not sure of the exact amount but they were offering a bonus.
|
12-14-2009, 05:43 PM | #19 |
Chaotic Neutral
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cherry Hill NJ
Moto: GV1200 Madura, Hawk gt
Posts: 13,992
|
that thing reminds me of the old super guppy
|
12-14-2009, 06:05 PM | #20 |
Crotch Rocket Curmudgeon
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Here to integrity
Moto: Li'l red baby Ninja
Posts: 7,482
|
OK, so obviously a guppy-type mod on a 747 platform is possible. That thing is in fact 3 stories tall, not two...so it begs the question:
The Dreamliner was a lightweight composite, energy efficient rethink for point-to-point travel from anywhere on Earth to anywhere on Earth...something that would allow airlines a complete rethink in how they "hub"...Airbus chose an alternate strategy, and chose to become the "big dog" in the commercial airline industry with the 380 double-decker... ...and pundits have argued that Boeing's strategy is now bound to pay off better, especially given the current industry outlook... ...but now that the Dreamliner is pretty much done, why doesn't Boeing just fit some new high bypass engines, lighter composite wings, and a pop-top addition to the venerable 747 airframe, and handily eat Airbus's lunch on both fronts?
__________________
Insert free thought here. |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|