Go Back   Two Wheel Fix > General > Off Topic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-25-2008, 10:39 AM   #1
pauldun170
Serious Business
 
pauldun170's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York
Moto: 1993 ZX-11 2008 CBR1000rr
Posts: 9,723
Default Einstein proven right

http://in.news.yahoo.com/48/20081121...n-prove_1.html
pauldun170 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2008, 11:46 AM   #2
fnfalman
Europhile
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SoCal
Moto: Aprilia RS125, Aprilia SR50 Factory, Aprilia Tuono, BMW Rockster, KTM 990 Adventure
Posts: 1,875
Default

It should be that Einstein hasn't been proven wrong.
__________________
Cogito Ergo Vroom - I think therefore I ride

fnfalman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2008, 11:49 AM   #3
Corey
AMA Supersport
 
Corey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Florida
Moto: Not a damn thing
Posts: 2,612
Default

I honestly thought this would be an article about some guy melting his skin off trying to fry a frozen turkey, thus adding more proof to Einstein's quote "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe."
__________________
Half man, half horse, half motorcycle. All awesome.

"Your game is shit, your company is shit. Activision ruined you! Activision ruined you." - Francis
Corey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2008, 12:55 PM   #4
pauldun170
Serious Business
 
pauldun170's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York
Moto: 1993 ZX-11 2008 CBR1000rr
Posts: 9,723
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fnfalman View Post
It should be that Einstein hasn't been proven wrong.
pauldun170 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2008, 01:58 PM   #5
Particle Man
Custom User Title
 
Particle Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central NY
Moto: 2003 SV650S
Posts: 14,959
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fnfalman View Post
It should be that Einstein hasn't been proven wrong.
agreed.

between this and day-to-day work in quantum mechanics the face of science is always changing...
__________________
I'm not "fat."
I'm "Enlarged to show texture."


Handle every stressful situation like a DOG: If you can't eat it or hump it, pi$$ on it & walk away.
Particle Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2008, 02:20 PM   #6
Captain Morgan
Let's do another U-turn
 
Captain Morgan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indiana
Moto: 2009 V-Strom
Posts: 3,816
Default

So, it took a "brainpower consortium" to prove a lone man's theory?

Also note the article wasn't edited very well. They post it as e=mc2, which isn't technically correct. They either need to use a superscript for the 2, use the carrot symbol to denote the 2 means squared, or they need to break the equation down to make it correct in print if they can't do either of the aforementioned. These are two ways to correctly display the equation if it isn't possible to use a superscript for the 2: e=mc^2 or e=m(c*c). These are both vastly different than e=mc2.

Last edited by Captain Morgan; 11-25-2008 at 02:26 PM..
Captain Morgan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2008, 02:33 PM   #7
pauldun170
Serious Business
 
pauldun170's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York
Moto: 1993 ZX-11 2008 CBR1000rr
Posts: 9,723
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Morgan View Post
So, it took a "brainpower consortium" to prove a lone man's theory?

Also note the article wasn't edited very well. They post it as e=mc2, which isn't technically correct. They either need to use a superscript for the 2, use the carrot symbol to denote the 2 means squared, or they need to break the equation down to make it correct in print if they can't do either of the aforementioned. These are two ways to correctly display the equation if it isn't possible to use a superscript for the 2: e=mc^2 or e=m(c*c). These are both vastly different than e=mc2.
Out of uncertainty I post this
Attached Images
File Type: jpg mess.jpg (33.5 KB, 39 views)
pauldun170 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2008, 02:37 PM   #8
Captain Morgan
Let's do another U-turn
 
Captain Morgan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indiana
Moto: 2009 V-Strom
Posts: 3,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pauldun170 View Post
Out of uncertainty I post this
Captain Morgan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2008, 02:38 PM   #9
fasternyou929
SFL Expatriate #2
 
fasternyou929's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Moto: CBR1000
Posts: 2,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Morgan View Post
So, it took a "brainpower consortium" to prove a lone man's theory?

Also note the article wasn't edited very well. They post it as e=mc2, which isn't technically correct. They either need to use a superscript for the 2, use the carrot symbol to denote the 2 means squared, or they need to break the equation down to make it correct in print if they can't do either of the aforementioned. These are two ways to correctly display the equation if it isn't possible to use a superscript for the 2: e=mc^2 or e=m(c*c). These are both vastly different than e=mc2.
e=mc2 is much better than one line where it was written "e-mc2".
fasternyou929 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2008, 02:43 PM   #10
Particle Man
Custom User Title
 
Particle Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central NY
Moto: 2003 SV650S
Posts: 14,959
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fasternyou929 View Post
"e-mc2".
boy would THAT fuck up the world of physics
__________________
I'm not "fat."
I'm "Enlarged to show texture."


Handle every stressful situation like a DOG: If you can't eat it or hump it, pi$$ on it & walk away.
Particle Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.