thought college was the bastion for free thought

[Adeptus_Minor]

Originally Posted by 101lifts2

But drinking and esctasy are OK.

Not together.
Too hard on the stomach.

[Particle Man]

Originally Posted by Adeptus_Minor

Not together.
Too hard on the stomach.

[Tmall]

Originally Posted by goof2

Most cigarettes have filters.

It doesn't matter anyway as toxic gases are still expelled from vehicle exhaust. Even if they weren't are you going to ban pre-emissions equipment vehicles? My bike is "only" 10 years old and doesn't have a catalytic converter to be found. It came that way from the factory.

You can't see the difference between a mode of transportation ( which has increasingly stringent rules placed on it's emissions) and a recreation activity which serves no means other than a "nicotine fix"?

Did you know you also cannot drink alcohol anywhere you wish? There are rules in effect about where you can or cannot do it.

Originally Posted by 101lifts2

But drinking and esctasy are OK. It's a bandwagon thing more than anything IMO.

Ever see somebody second hand raving? It's a horrible sight..

[goof2]

Originally Posted by Tmall

You can't see the difference between a mode of transportation ( which has increasingly stringent rules placed on it's emissions) and a recreation activity which serves no means other than a "nicotine fix"?

Driving/riding can be a mode of transportation, but that doesn't mean that is all it is. Should we ban driving/riding for recreational purposes and call it a day? Maybe you have to have a note from an authority backing the validity of your trip.

Originally Posted by Tmall

Did you know you also cannot drink alcohol anywhere you wish? There are rules in effect about where you can or cannot do it.

I'm aware and that actually serves as a pretty good comparison. It is another rule created by uptight "puritans" who can't handle the sight of someone having a drink in front of them. It is also a rule I have ignored from time to time.

[Tmall]

Originally Posted by goof2

Driving/riding can be a mode of transportation, but that doesn't mean that is all it is. Should we ban driving/riding for recreational purposes and call it a day? Maybe you have to have a note from an authority backing the validity of your trip.



I'm aware and that actually serves as a pretty good comparison. It is another rule created by uptight "puritans" who can't handle the sight of someone having a drink in front of them. It is also a rule I have ignored from time to time.

You're really reaching to draw the comparison between driving and smoking, it's just not working. "What if this, what if that about driving?" What about it? We're not talking about the rules pertaining to driving. We're talking about the right of a person to walk around and not breathe in another person's second hand smoke.

If you can equate that to car exhaust, have fun with that. Your right to travel sounds more familiar than your right to smoke cigarettes.

[Kaneman]

Originally Posted by Homeslice

Retards. I bet if it was pot, they'd leave people alone. Hypocrites.

Despite Marijuana being Kentucky's largest cash crop they actually have very strict anti-pot laws...

[Homeslice]

Originally Posted by Kaneman

Despite Marijuana being Kentucky's largest cash crop they actually have very strict anti-pot laws...

All the young people leave for places with better jobs........What's left behind are old white people who complain.

[goof2]

Originally Posted by Tmall

You're really reaching to draw the comparison between driving and smoking, it's just not working. "What if this, what if that about driving?" What about it? We're not talking about the rules pertaining to driving. We're talking about the right of a person to walk around and not breathe in another person's second hand smoke.

If you can equate that to car exhaust, have fun with that. Your right to travel sounds more familiar than your right to smoke cigarettes.

There isn't any if about it, you believe my right to pollute the air should be removed while your right to pollute the air is upheld.

[Tmall]

Originally Posted by goof2

There isn't any if about it, you believe my right to pollute the air should be removed while your right to pollute the air is upheld.

Neither is a right. Unless you want to include your right to travel freely in your country. I'd like to see the line about your right to smoke marlboros in the constitution.

[goof2]

Originally Posted by Tmall

Neither is a right. Unless you want to include your right to travel freely in your country. I'd like to see the line about your right to smoke marlboros in the constitution.

You have a point. I should have used another word. Substitute freedom, ability, or whatever word you want, the idea remains the same.