Go Back   Two Wheel Fix > In the Garage or Shop > Manufacturer War

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-29-2010, 02:16 PM   #31
Dave
Chaotic Neutral
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cherry Hill NJ
Moto: GV1200 Madura, Hawk gt
Posts: 13,992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cutty72 View Post
It's a more user friendly power band, you don't need to rev it to the moon to make it go, or it won't require that extra downshift that a 600 might.
litre bikes fit that bill well, so do medium and heavyweight twins and triples
__________________
TWF Post whore #6
Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2010, 02:50 PM   #32
Gas Man
Trip's Assistant
 
Gas Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Imported from Detroit
Moto: 2009 HD Street Classic
Posts: 12,149
Default

I'm with rider on the greatness of the gsxr 750. Its a great overall bike.

On the subject, I hv no input.
Gas Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2010, 03:20 PM   #33
Homeslice
Elitist
 
Homeslice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Moto: Gix 750
Posts: 11,351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NONE_too_SOFT View Post
Yea i get the benefits of the bigger motor, but thats my point. do you really NEED more torque and a better power band on the street? 99% of riders will never get close to the potential of their bike anyways.
Yes because you don't need to shift as much. Also, the older you get, the less revs and noise you're willing to tolerate on an extended basis.
Homeslice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2010, 03:49 PM   #34
NONE_too_SOFT
Chopstix / \
 
NONE_too_SOFT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Akron OH
Moto: 03 CBR RR
Posts: 5,350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Homeslice View Post
Yes because you don't need to shift as much. Also, the older you get, the less revs and noise you're willing to tolerate on an extended basis.
hah so its an old mans bike.

you said it not me.

where's rider?
NONE_too_SOFT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2010, 04:34 PM   #35
Cutty72
Ride Naked.
 
Cutty72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Flat and Straight ND
Moto: 08 BUELL 1125R, 05 SV650S
Posts: 7,916
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave View Post
litre bikes fit that bill well, so do medium and heavyweight twins and triples
True, but liter bikes are more $$ for insurance (depending on person/area) and it is getting hard to find a good twin sport bike that doesn't cost $20K new.
__________________
Adrenaline... the wonder drug.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gas Man View Post
Again... Cutty you are one smart man!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Chi View Post
If I have to get help to get it back up, I dont need to be riding it.

3662 Supply NCO

Cutty72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2010, 09:01 PM   #36
smileyman
White Trash Hero
 
smileyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NW Arkansas
Moto: Buell 1125R Porco Rosso Edition
Posts: 4,895
Default

Tires. Liter bikes eat em! Middleweights dont eat them as bad.
Handing, liter bikes stop and shoot, cause all that crankshaft makes for hard turning and slow direction changes...
Power, if they made a 2000 I would want one!
__________________

Arkriders.com
To be the best you must first be willing to risk the worst!
smileyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 08:29 AM   #37
NONE_too_SOFT
Chopstix / \
 
NONE_too_SOFT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Akron OH
Moto: 03 CBR RR
Posts: 5,350
Default

i think we're making mountains out of mole hills.
NONE_too_SOFT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 09:59 AM   #38
derf
token jewboy
 
derf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Moto: CBR 900, KLR ugly ass duckling, Gas Man
Posts: 10,799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NONE_too_SOFT View Post
i think we're making mountains out of mole hills.
I got the shovel.

Really though the newest batch of 1k's are they even any heavier than the 600s now? By what 30 lbs? 5 or 10 years ago yes the liter bikes were much more point and shoot bike, but they have grown so much on the last decade to the point where an 09-10 CBR1k or ZX10r really can handle like a 600.
__________________
derf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 11:39 AM   #39
Dave
Chaotic Neutral
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cherry Hill NJ
Moto: GV1200 Madura, Hawk gt
Posts: 13,992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by derf View Post
I got the shovel.

Really though the newest batch of 1k's are they even any heavier than the 600s now? By what 30 lbs? 5 or 10 years ago yes the liter bikes were much more point and shoot bike, but they have grown so much on the last decade to the point where an 09-10 CBR1k or ZX10r really can handle like a 600.
from the sport rider page my bike was either the same weight as comparable year 600s and lighter than 750s and up. its only become more so with all the new emissions crap they are stuffing in there
__________________
TWF Post whore #6
Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 11:40 AM   #40
Dave
Chaotic Neutral
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cherry Hill NJ
Moto: GV1200 Madura, Hawk gt
Posts: 13,992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smileyman View Post
Tires. Liter bikes eat em! Middleweights dont eat them as bad.
Handing, liter bikes stop and shoot, cause all that crankshaft makes for hard turning and slow direction changes...
Power, if they made a 2000 I would want one!
dont work your wrist so much, they last longer and triumph makes a two litre
__________________
TWF Post whore #6
Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.